Former National Counterterrorism Center director Joe Kent is receiving backlash after saying that, if needed, he will serve as a witness for the defense in the murder trial of Charlie Kirk.

During an interview with journalist Michael Shellenberger, Joe Kent said he questions whether the lone shooter narrative explains Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

Kent shared, when he was the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, “The FBI was pretty forceful in saying we couldn’t investigate further.”

He later added that he could be called as a witness by the defense in the case of Tyler Robinson, who is accused of killing Charlie Kirk, after suggesting a foreign power may have been behind Kirk’s assassination.

When Shellenberger noted that his defense could assist Robinson’s defense, Kent responded, “Then, honestly, so be it. If it gets us to the truth.”

Joe Kent says he is skeptical that Tyler Robinson, who confessed to killing Charlie Kirk, was the lone shooter. That accusation could undermine the prosecutors’ case against Robinson. Kent says he knew of the risk before he decided to speak out. pic.twitter.com/hd6QNHw4jo

— Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) March 24, 2026

Per Yahoo News:

Joe Kent says he is skeptical that Tyler Robinson, who confessed to killing Charlie Kirk, was the lone shooter. That accusation could undermine the prosecutors’ case against Robinson. Kent says he knew of the risk before he decided to speak out.

The former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent, says that the FBI did not properly investigate the assassination last fall of conservative leader Charlie Kirk. “The FBI was pretty forceful in saying we couldn’t investigate further,” he told Public. “I saw no action being taken.”

Tyler Robinson confessed to killing Kirk in a text message and a note to his trans-identified romantic partner. His defense team may now be able to use Kent’s allegations that the government is suppressing evidence and did not do a proper investigation to their advantage.

Kent said he knew that he might be called as a witness before he made his statements that a “foreign nexus” may have been involved in Kirk’s assassination. “I was definitely warned of that over and over again,” said Kent. “If I end up having to play that role, then I’ll do it. It’s not something I’m seeking.” When pressed that his testimony could help the Robinson defense, Kent said, “Then, honestly, so be it. If it gets us to the truth… That’s obviously the risk I’m taking.”

In response to Kent’s statement, Charlie Kirk’s longtime producer and now co-host of the Charlie Kirk Show, Blake Neff, took to X to vent his frustration with Kent’s comments.

Neff wrote, “Tyler Robinson literally confessed to his parents, was turned in by them, and has his DNA all over the weapon used to kill Charlie.

“But some people are so obsessed with hating Israel, the same thing they are obsessed with literally every day, that they will try to help a murderer get off so they can keep pursuing their daily obsession,” added Neff.

LOOK:

Tyler Robinson literally confessed to his parents, and was turned in by them, and has his DNA all over the weapon used to kill Charlie.

But some people are so obsessed with hating Israel, the same thing they are obsessed with literally every day, that they will try to help a…

— Blake Neff (@BlakeSNeff) March 24, 2026

Andrew Kolvet, who also co-hosts the Charlie Kirk Show, said, “Joe Kent just crossed a red line, and it’s a massive betrayal of Charlie, his wife, his kids, and the entire TPUSA family.”

WATCH:

Shortly after Robinson’s arrest, the prosecutors released a probable cause affidavit detailing the evidence gathered immediately after Charlie’s assassination.

The evidence presented at that time was overwhelming.

In the months that have followed, we know the investigation has… pic.twitter.com/zD2jFMsya7

— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) March 24, 2026

The post Joe Kent Says He’d Testify in Charlie Kirk Murder Case, Even If It Helps Accused Assassin Tyler Robinson appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Photo Sian Dowsett/Instagram

Sexual harassment in the British Armed Forces has long become a problem.

The Armed Forces Sexualized Behaviors and Sexual Harassment Survey, published by the UK Ministry of Defense (MoD) in November 2025, covered experiences across the Army, Royal Navy, and RAF.

The survey revealed that 67% of female regular personnel in the UK Armed Forces (and 69% in the Navy) experienced at least one form of sexualized behavior in the past 12 months.

One specific issue includes 32% of women reporting unwanted physical touching or groping.

But it seems that this sexual misconduct has become a two-way street, as a female sailor is being court-martialed for carrying out seven ‘opportunistic sexual assaults’ on male and female shipmates.

Royal Navy Seaman Sian Dowsett is standing trial at Bulford Military Court, accused of a string of sexual assaults against male and female colleagues aboard HMS Dauntless.

Prosecutors claim she repeatedly grabbed male sailors by the crotch and made suggestive comments, such… pic.twitter.com/1S2QHHXI4x

— Europa.com (@europa) March 24, 2026

The Telegraph reported:

“Able Seaman Sian Dowsett, 25, allegedly groped four of her Royal Navy colleagues – two men and two women.

Based on HMS Dauntless, AB Dowsett is accused of grabbing the men by their crotches, stroking their arms, and making comments such as: ‘I like my coffee how I like my men, big and strong’.

She allegedly smacked women sailors’ bottoms and squeezed their breasts, on one occasion asking: ‘Do you like that, baby girl?’”

Female sailor seen as ‘cancer on the ship’ carried out a string of seven sexual assaults against male and female shipmates, court martial told https://t.co/ID0Be83QJM

— Daily Mail (@DailyMail) March 24, 2026

At Bulford Military Court, Dowsett was described as a ‘cancer on the ship’ by one seaman.

“Prosecutors said her offences ‘ranged from nipple-pinching to bottom-slapping and genital-grabbing’ but AB Dowsett denied the seven counts of sexual assault on the two men and two women.”

Read more:

Lesbian ‘DEI Hire’ Captain of New Zealand Navy Ship That Ran Aground Has Been Charged With Negligence, Will Face Court-Martial Over the Sinking

The post British Female Sailor Court-Martialed for ‘Sexually Assaulting Four Shipmates’ on Royal Navy Destroyer appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

During a high-stakes hearing of the Subcommittee on Federal Courts, Oversight, Agency Action, and Federal Rights, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) dropped a series of nuclear revelations regarding the “Arctic Frost” investigation, a sweeping, clandestine operation by the Biden-era DOJ and FBI designed to spy on the political opposition.

The Gateway Pundit has been hammering this story since February, when we reported that Biden’s FBI secretly snatched the phone records of Kash Patel and Susie Wiles in 2022 and 2023 as part of deranged Special Counsel Jack Smith’s sham classified-documents probe into papers lawfully stored at Mar-a-Lago.

Joe Biden’s FBI wiretapped a privileged attorney-client call involving top Trump adviser Susie Wiles, without the consent of either party, and then attempted to bury the evidence.

Axios reporter Marc Caputo reports that the lawyer, who has not been publicly identified, denied the accusation that he approved the FBI recording.

The revelations were confirmed during the hearing titled “Arctic Frost: A Modern Watergate,” held by the Subcommittee on Federal Courts, Oversight, Agency Action, and Federal Rights.

Witnesses included:

• Will Chamberlain (Article III Project)
• Margot Cleveland (The Federalist)
• Christopher O’Leary (former FBI agent)

What they described was nothing short of chilling.

Cruz walked Cleveland through the scope of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation, and the numbers alone are staggering:

• Nearly 200 subpoenas issued
• Over 400 Republican individuals and organizations targeted
• Some targets had no connection to January 6
• Others didn’t even exist at the time

Cruz asked about subpoenaing toll records of members of Congress. Cleveland confirmed it raises massive Speech and Debate Clause problems. When Jack Smith tried to force AT&T to cough up Ted Cruz’s own records, AT&T flat-out refused, saying it violated the Constitution. Smith backed down like a coward and never even tried to enforce it in court.

Cleveland made it crystal clear, Smith knew well what he was doing was illegal.

Cruz then turned to the First Amendment nightmare of seizing donor lists, internal communications, and organization records. Cleveland confirmed it directly violates freedom of association, citing the Supreme Court’s NAACP precedent.

Will Chamberlain, Senior Counsel at Article III Project, delivered the knockout punch. Asked what specific crimes the “Arctic Frost” dragnet actually uncovered, Chamberlain said: “I’m not aware of any crimes that were uncovered.”

He also confirmed that the victims including the senators, donors, organizations, private citizens, would probably never have known about this secret surveillance operation had Trump not won in 2024, thanks to nondisclosure orders and the records being buried in “prohibited access files” only the FBI Director could see.

Chamberlain didn’t mince words comparing it to Watergate: “If anything, it might even be greater. I mean, the scope of this in terms of the sheer number of people and organizations affected. And as I discussed, this brazen violation of attorney-client privilege, wiretapping a phone call between Susie Wiles and her lawyer. These are egregious offenses. And if Watergate was just about a single break-in, this is effectively compound that by 200.”

WATCH:

HOLY CRAP! Senator Cruz CONFIRMED that Biden’s FBI wiretapped Susie Wiles during a PRIVILEGED CALL with her lawyer without the consent of EITHER party.

To make it HORRENDOUSLY worse, they then tried to HIDE evidence of their actions by marking the file “prohibited.”

This… pic.twitter.com/8WIg9k9ak9

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) March 24, 2026

During the hearing, Senator Mike Lee zeroed in on one of the most disturbing elements of the entire scandal: the FBI’s internal classification of key evidence as a “prohibited file.”

Lee then walked through what may be the most damning allegation yet, the recording of a 2023 phone call between Susie Wiles and her attorney.

This was a privileged legal conversation, one of the most protected forms of communication under U.S. law.

Chamberlain explained the gravity:

“There’s two interests being invaded… it’s doubly invasive because it’s supposed to be a privileged conversation.”

Joe Biden’s FBI spied on privileged conversations between President Trump’s campaign manager and her lawyer.

They spied on members of Congress.

The Deep State can still spy on YOU. pic.twitter.com/LDzYHT7VWk

— Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) March 24, 2026

The post ‘Arctic Frost’ Scandal: Biden FBI Wiretapped Trump Adviser Susie Wiles During Privileged Attorney Call, Then Hid Evidence in “Prohibited” Files appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.