Something doesn’t add up, and I’m not buying the official story.

Today on Stinchfield, I dig into the sudden shift from Joe Kent, a man who once sounded the alarm on Iran, now suddenly backing away and denouncing the very conflict he previously warned about. What changed? And more importantly, who got to him?

Then there’s the eyebrow-raising appearance on Shawn Ryan’s show, a platform with well-documented ties to intelligence circles.

Coincidence or coordination?

Because when you connect the dots, a chilling possibility emerges: Was Kent positioned as part of a broader effort by the intelligence community to manipulate the narrative and ultimately undermine Donald Trump?

What if bad intel was deliberately fed into the system, designed to drag Trump into a geopolitical trap? A war meant to make him look reckless, outmatched, and dangerous on the world stage.

But here’s the twist they didn’t see coming: Trump did not fail. His leadership and the strength of the United States military flipped the script.

So now what?

A sudden reversal. A resignation. A retreat from the narrative.

Was Joe Kent’s exit a clean-up operation? A desperate attempt to salvage a plot that did not go as planned?

This is about more than one man. This is about the machinery behind the scenes—and whether the so-called deep state just got caught overplaying its hand.

The post Is Joe Kent’s Resignation Part of a Broader “CIA/Deep State” Plot to Undermine President Trump? (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

On March 16, 2026, Trafalgar Square, often seen as the heart of London’s imperial and Christian heritage, changed in a new way. Instead of tourists or the usual crowds around Nelson’s Column, thousands of Muslim worshippers gathered for a mass Open Iftar and public prayers during Ramadan. The Islamic call to prayer, the adhan, echoed across the square.

Videos show rows of men kneeling, with amplified speakers broadcasting Arabic prayers over one of Britain’s most famous landmarks. This was not a quiet or private event. It was a public gathering, openly supported by London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s administration.

Conservative MP Nick Timothy spoke out strongly and described the event as “an act of domination” and “straight from the Islamist playbook.”

Timothy, who once advised Theresa May at Downing Street, argued that these visible displays of Islamic identity in historic public spaces are not just about multiculturalism. He said they are deliberate statements of supremacy that do not fit with Britain’s Christian foundations and national identity.

The timing matters. Ramadan 2026 has seen more public prayers across UK cities. The Trafalgar Square event, promoted as “inclusive,” broadcast the adhan loudly without comparable Christian or secular events. In countries like Saudi Arabia, public Christian worship is banned, yet Britain accommodates. To many Britons, it signals their heritage is open to change, while others’ are not.

This isn’t unique. Similar gatherings have occurred in New York’s Times Square during Ramadan, drawing criticism from American conservatives. In both countries, progressive politicians praise these events as “diversity wins” but often overlook the demographic and cultural changes. Britain’s Muslim population now exceeds 6.5% and is growing rapidly through immigration and birth rates, with more calls for public religious expression.

At what point does accommodation become surrender?

Security concerns are real. Large gatherings in central London raise risks. Past scandals and terror plots have shown that some communities have different loyalties, and officials warn about radicalization. Allowing the adhan in a square built to honor British victories suggests weakness, not strength, and signals to extremists that British landmarks are open to symbolic use.

Free speech and religious freedom should apply to everyone, but Britain’s double standard is becoming more obvious. A Christian street preacher quoting the Bible might be arrested for “hate speech.” At the same time, calls to prayer that say “Allah is the greatest” and reject other faiths are heard in public without challenge.

Tory MP Timothy’s comments highlight this double standard: the government silences local dissent while supporting or ignoring the spread of foreign cultures. This is identity politics at work—what is “pride” for one group can feel like erasure for another.

The broader cultural conflict is clear. Trafalgar Square has never been neutral. It honors Admiral Nelson, who defended Christendom against threats from the East. Its lions, fountains, and columns stand for British strength and Christian civilization. Replacing these symbols with mass prostration during Ramadan is not “enrichment.” It is a replacement.

Demographic projections suggest Muslims may become the majority in several major UK cities within a few decades, so these public displays are likely to increase. The question for policymakers, and for Americans watching their own cities, is whether Western nations still have the will to protect their founding identities.

The Church of England in Britain has mostly remained silent, showing years of institutional retreat. American evangelicals and Catholic leaders should pay attention: the same trends seen in London are happening in New York, Chicago, and other cities. Progressive leaders in both the UK and the US promote “inclusion,” while Christianity is quietly pushed aside. Schools remove Christmas references. Crosses are taken down. Yet the adhan grows louder.

Nick Timothy’s direct comments should be heard, not silenced. Britain and the West face a choice: reclaim public spaces as reflections of their Judeo-Christian heritage, or watch them become centers for another culture. Trafalgar Square is part of Britain. The adhan belongs somewhere else. Unless leaders act on this, the sense of domination will continue, one prayer, one square, and one concession at a time until full Islamisation is complete.

The post London’s Trafalgar Square Is British, Not for the Adhan: Tory MP Criticizes Public Islamic Prayer as Domination appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Vice-President JD Vance speaks at a manufacturing plant in Auburn Hills, Michigan, on Wednesday. Credit: White House Facebook screenshot

Vice-President JD Vance brought the crowd to its feet after slapping down a fake news reporter trying to spread fear about President Trump’s motives regarding securing America’s elections.

As WSBT reported, Vance delivered remarks on Wednesday at a manufacturing facility in Auburn Hills, which focused on topics ranging from national security, jobs, deregulation, crime, immigration, and election integrity.

He also touted President Trump’s success in cutting taxes, shutting down the border, and reducing crime.

Following Vance’s remarks, a reporter decided to entrap the Vice-President by accusing Trump of trying to take over federal elections.

Trump, in the past, has suggested the federal government should ‘take over the voting’ in certain blue states, which have few guardrails against voter fraud.

The White House has since clarified that Trump was talking about the SAVE America Act, which imposes a Voter ID requirement.

The SAVE America Act is an absolutely critical measure that requires every American to show ID to cast a ballot. It also requires proof of citizenship BEFORE registering to vote.

Democrats are in meltdown mode because, should the measure pass, they will find stealing elections far more challenging.

Vance’s reply to the reporter was absolutely perfect. He told him that if ensuring everyone has a voter ID means the federal government intervening in an election, then of course it’s justified.

The crowd went wild after Vance finished.

WATCH:

WOW! JD Vance just gave a FIRE response to a reporter asking if Trump was going to “nationalize elections”

“If what you mean by intervening in the election is we want voter ID before voting in this country, then YES!”

And the crowd went freaking wildpic.twitter.com/HSVTkBWTI5

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) March 18, 2026

REPORTER: Trump has talked about nationalizing elections in recent months. You know, it’s state…

VANCE: If what you mean by intervening in the election is that we want everybody to have a voter ID before voting in this country, then yes, we should be doing that!

(Crowd erupts in applause and yells “USA! USA!” after hearing Vance’s response).

The post Crowd Goes Wild After Hearing VP JD Vance’s Reply to Reporter Asking About President Trump Supposedly Trying to ‘Nationalize Elections’ (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.