Connect with us

Politics

Air Force Officer Is Fighting to Restore His Record After Years of ‘Reprisal and Retaliation’ over the COVID-19 Shot

Published

on

Image: Wikimedia Commons (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Melody Howley)

As the Department of War intensifies its initiatives to restore the careers of service members impacted by the COVID-19 shot mandate, an Air Force officer is working hard to vindicate himself against tough odds.

The Gateway Pundit spoke to Captain Anthony Monteleone, an active-duty Air Force Officer with 18 years of service. On September 23, 2021, Capt. Monteleone submitted a Religious Accommodation Request for the COVID-19 shot mandate previously implemented by former Department of Defense (DoD) Secretary Lloyd Austin in August 2021.

Although the shot mandate has now been deemed “unlawful as implemented,” Capt. Monteleone said the actions of his commander during the subject mandate’s unlawful implementation have resulted in “almost four full years of grave, extensive, and irreparable harm to [his] family and military career, ending [his] ability to continue to serve in the military without external intervention.”

While the tyrannical enforcement of the mandate was in effect, Capt. Monteleone said he filed at least nine Inspector General complaints, an Article 138 Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) complaint, and two Congressional Inquiries against the unlawful orders and actions of his commander—none of which resulted in relief. He noted that “acts of reprisal and retaliation,” as well as the absence of protections entitled to him under the Military Whistleblower Protection Act during this period destroyed his military career and caused irreparable harm to him and his family.

“During the mandate my commander issued a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), an Unfavorable Information File (UIF), and a Referral Officer Performance Report (OPR),” Capt. Monteleone shared. “I faced a Dishonorable Discharge on two separate occasions, was subjected to an unlawful search and seizure, had my promotion delayed for over a year, received other erroneous OPRs, was banned from my base due to my unvaccinated status, lost military Tuition Assistance for a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), had to disenroll from my PhD program due to the UIF, and was banned from a Permanent Change of Station (PCS) because of my unvaccinated status, resulting in missing out on multiple career opportunities afforded to my vaccinated peers.”

The same commander allegedly refused to hire him for a General Schedule (G-13) position because he had not taken the shot cancelled a no cost joint career broadening assignment after the PCS ban, and denied multiple iterations of PCS awards after five years of exemplary service at his unit. He also noted he was denied multiple flight commander positions, denied an Assistant Director of Operations (ADO) position, and all formal and professional education and training opportunities during the mandate period.

“Because of the actions of my commander during the unlawful DoD COVID-19 vaccine mandate, I still have active derogatory paperwork in my personnel file, and not only was I denied, but I am also still ineligible or severely disadvantaged for all career enhancement programs,” Capt. Monteleone disclosed. “I am also ineligible or severely disadvantaged for special assignments and postings because of what was put in my record.”

What’s more, he said, “The actions of my commander also caused severe physical, mental, emotional, and financial strain to my family, as well as substantial moral injury.” As a husband and father of three children, he admitted, “this experience has placed immense fear, stress, anxiety, and worry on me and my family, and has not only negatively affected both my physical and mental health, but also the health of my family.”

“The entire experience has been extremely disheartening,” he lamented. “Since prior to the mandate and destruction of my career, I planned to continue my career in the military well past the 20-year mark and continue to serve as long as I was able.”

What was Capt Monteleone’s final hope for justice? Submit a packet for relief to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR). Capt. Monteleone. He submitted the packet on July 8, 2025, to correct the harms from the unlawful mandate in collaboration with his attorney Jeffrey Addicott, Director of the Warrior Defense Project, and Mike Rose, Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Stand Together Against Racism and Radicalism in the Services (STARRS).

Incredibly, on September 3, the AFBCMR denied his application stating that his request “falls outside the jurisdiction of the AFBCMR. However, with the recent directive from President Donald Trump on providing relief to the military victims of the COVID mandates, the AFBCMR has reversed itself and is now reconsidering Capt. Monteleone’s case. In turn, Addicott has reached out to the Congressional Justice for Warriors Caucus, headed by Congressman Eli Crane, to request help while Rose is assisting in bringing this matter to the attention of the Secretary of the Air Force Dr. Troy Meink or Under Secretary Matthew Lohmeier.

Capt. Monteleone’s case is one of the most egregious and will certainly serve as a pattern of justice for all those who suffered under the intolerance and vindictiveness that accompanied the COVID 19 mandate. He emphasized that his views are his own and do not reflect those of the Department of War or the Department of the Air Force.

The post Air Force Officer Is Fighting to Restore His Record After Years of ‘Reprisal and Retaliation’ over the COVID-19 Shot appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Victor Reacts: This Is Sick, Predatory, Disgusting Behavior by Minnesota Democrats (VIDEO)

Published

on

By

Young man discussing the impact of early exposure to pornography on adolescents, highlighting statistics about boys and girls at critical developmental ages.

Young man discussing the impact of early exposure to pornography on adolescents, highlighting statistics about boys and girls at critical developmental ages.

Children are often exposed to pornographic content between ten and thirteen years old.

How is that possible?

Children cannot buy firearms, alcohol, or even spray paint.

So why are so many children exposed to such graphic adult content?

Because of things like this.

The Gateway Pundit reported,

Every single Minnesota House Democrat voted against a bill that would have required age verification on pornographic websites to protect children from watching or accessing explicit online content.

The vote on House File 1434 ended in a 67-67 tie on Thursday, with all 67 Republicans supporting the measure and all 67 Democrats opposing it.

The tie killed the bill.

The legislation would have mandated that commercial websites where 25 percent or more of the content consists of material harmful to minors verify that users are at least 18 years old before granting access.

The bill defines “harmful to minors” based on standards lacking serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for youth.

It included protections for data privacy and enforcement mechanisms through the attorney general and private lawsuits by parents.

As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, during a debate about the bill, Democrat State Representative Leigh Finke, the state’s first openly transgender legislator, voiced strong opposition, claiming porn can be “educational” for queer kids.

Finke claimed that the vague definition of “prurient interest” could be interpreted to include “the very existence of transgender kids.”

Intentionally allowing children to be exposed to this content is sick, predatory, and disgusting.

The left appears hellbent on destroying the innocence of children. Parents everywhere should take note.

The post Victor Reacts: This Is Sick, Predatory, Disgusting Behavior by Minnesota Democrats (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Politics

The Catholic Church erupts after the euthanasia death of Noelia Castillo and delivers its harshest criticism in years

Published

on

By

Two women stand on a beach, one seated in a wheelchair wearing a brown jacket, with palm trees and houses in the background.

Two women stand on a beach, one seated in a wheelchair wearing a brown jacket, with palm trees and houses in the background.

This is a Gateway Hispanic article.

The post The Catholic Church erupts after the euthanasia death of Noelia Castillo and delivers its harshest criticism in years appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Politics

WATCH: CNN Crew Apprehended by IDF in the West Bank – Says They Were Assaulted and Equipment was Damaged – IDF Releases Statement

Published

on

By

Soldiers in tactical gear display weapons while engaging in a military operation, illustrating security efforts in a conflict zone.Soldiers in tactical gear display weapons while engaging in a military operation, illustrating security efforts in a conflict zone.IDF Soldiers detain CNN crew in the West Bank

A CNN crew reporting on Israeli settlements in the West Bank in Palestine was detained by IDF soldiers on Friday. 

The reporters say they were put in a chokehold after they and several Palestinian residents were approached by armed troops.

According to the Jerusalem Post,

The CNN team was interviewing Palestinian residents of the West Bank town of Tayasir after settlers established an outpost in the town and violently attacked residents.

While conducting interviews on camera, IDF soldiers ordered the team and the Palestinians to stop speaking and aimed their weapons at the group, according to the CNN reporters present.

Video from the incident shows the reporters being approached and detained.

WATCH:

The full report from CNN features the outposts established by Israeli settlers in the West Bank and stories of the violent attacks from Palestinian residents.

The clip further shows CNN Jerusalem correspondent Jeremy Diamond speaking with IDF soldiers, one of whom tells him, “We are here because this is our place… The land is ours.” When asked if all of the West Bank belongs to Israelis, the soldier replies, “Of course, and not just for the soldiers, for the jews.”

Another soldier details the alleged murder of an 18-year-old Israeli settler by a Palestinian, saying they are exacting revenge against the residents in the West Bank.

The soldier, Meir, later tells  Diamond that while the settlement in Tayasir is not legal, “it will be… slowly.” He agrees that it will be legal thanks to the IDF and his presence, saying, “Of course … I help my people.”

“Meir is describing the settler playbook, and the role Israeli soldiers often play in propping it up,” Diamond says in his report. “The Israeli military did not respond to CNN’s questions about soldiers’ conduct in the West Bank, including our detention. Amid the war with Iran, those efforts are intensifying, with at least four outposts established this week alone, land often taken with the blood of Palestinians,” he continues.

The IDF did provide a statement to CNN, writing, “The actions and behavior of the soldiers in the incident are incompatible with what is expected of IDF soldiers operating in the Judea and Samaria area.”

WATCH:

The post WATCH: CNN Crew Apprehended by IDF in the West Bank – Says They Were Assaulted and Equipment was Damaged – IDF Releases Statement appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Trending