Something doesn’t add up, and I’m not buying the official story.

Today on Stinchfield, I dig into the sudden shift from Joe Kent, a man who once sounded the alarm on Iran, now suddenly backing away and denouncing the very conflict he previously warned about. What changed? And more importantly, who got to him?

Then there’s the eyebrow-raising appearance on Shawn Ryan’s show, a platform with well-documented ties to intelligence circles.

Coincidence or coordination?

Because when you connect the dots, a chilling possibility emerges: Was Kent positioned as part of a broader effort by the intelligence community to manipulate the narrative and ultimately undermine Donald Trump?

What if bad intel was deliberately fed into the system, designed to drag Trump into a geopolitical trap? A war meant to make him look reckless, outmatched, and dangerous on the world stage.

But here’s the twist they didn’t see coming: Trump did not fail. His leadership and the strength of the United States military flipped the script.

So now what?

A sudden reversal. A resignation. A retreat from the narrative.

Was Joe Kent’s exit a clean-up operation? A desperate attempt to salvage a plot that did not go as planned?

This is about more than one man. This is about the machinery behind the scenes—and whether the so-called deep state just got caught overplaying its hand.

The post Is Joe Kent’s Resignation Part of a Broader “CIA/Deep State” Plot to Undermine President Trump? (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Despite the numerous anti-war detractors, the anti-Israel detractors, and the far-left media insisting the US is losing its war against Iran after TWO WEEKS – MAGA Voters are standing with Trump.

Evidently, the anti-Israel crowd does not have as much clout as they would like to admit.

CNN’s Harry Enten first broke liberal hearts when he shared his first set of numbers.
100% of MAGA voters approve of President Donald John Trump!

CNN’s Harry Enton breaks liberal hearts with his latest set of Trump approval numbers.

CNN’s Harry Enten then broke the news on Wednesday that 90% of MAGA voters support the military action in Iran!
90 percent!

Here is the transcript from CNN:

Harry Enten: MAGA GOP view of Trump: approve 100%. 100%. If you are a member of MAGA and the GOP, you approve of Donald John Trump. 0% say that they disapprove. You don’t have to be a mathematical genius to know you can’t go higher than 100%. He is the 1972 Miami Dolphins. Now, there are some Republicans who disapprove of Donald John Trump, but they are not members of the Make America Great Again movement. The bottom line is this: if you are a member of MAGA, you approve of Donald Trump.

CNN’s Sara Sidner: It’s interesting, though, because there have been a couple prominent people who have sort of come out online and they’re very mad about this war with Iran because he promised no new wars. Is there any sign that people might be leaving MAGA relative to 2024?

Harry Enten: Yeah. Okay. So, you know, I’ve said it before and, you know, The theme of this segment is Tucker Carlson be darned. And when we look at the numbers, I mean, I’ve heard some people say, oh, you know what, when you look at those MAGA numbers, it doesn’t account for those who might have left MAGA. But take a look here. Americans who identify as MAGA in November of 2024, it was 28% of Americans. Now it’s basically the same. If anything, it’s slightly higher at 30%. The bottom line is this: the MAGA base within the GOP is not shrinking. It’s the same size. If anything, it is slightly larger than it was back in 2024 when, of course, Donald Trump won a second term. So that 100% that Donald Trump has approval among MAGA GOP. That is not an artifact of MAGA shrinking. It’s just an indication of how strong Donald Trump’s grip is on that MAGA base.

CNN’s Sara Sidner: And so I guess that begs the question, what’s happening with inside the GOP and if there are any splits there? Because with that, those kind of numbers, they’re going to want to retain that, right? So they can retain their seats. Yes.

Harry Enten: Yes. And you know what we’re talking about? You know, we mentioned Iran in the intro of this segment. GOP on US military action in Iran. Look at this. Imagine it’s 90% approval. It’s 90% approval, just 5% disapproval. If you disapprove of the job that Donald Trump is doing, or excuse me, the US military action in Iran, and you’re a member of the GOP, look at this. It’s your non-MAGA. You’re not MAGA. It’s 36% there, 54% approve. But the majority of Republicans approve of the job that the US military action is in Iran. And the majority of MAGA, which is the majority of the GOP, very much approve, 90%, very little split in Donald Trump’s base. Those who disapprove in the GOP, simply put, they hate MAGA.

CNN’s Sara Sidner:: It’s really clear MAGA has the floor.

BREAKING: In a STUNNING moment, CNN was just forced to report that Donald Trump has 100% MAGA APPROVAL

100%. WOW

The kicker? The share of voters who call themselves “MAGA” is the *SAME* as when he won in 2024!

“You don’t have to be a GENIUS to know you can’t go higher… pic.twitter.com/QRFXfywKax

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 18, 2026

The post Despite Detractors, MAGA Remains Intact! 100% of MAGA Supports Trump – 90% of MAGA Voters Approve of Trump’s US Military Action in Iran (Video) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

On March 16, 2026, Trafalgar Square, often seen as the heart of London’s imperial and Christian heritage, changed in a new way. Instead of tourists or the usual crowds around Nelson’s Column, thousands of Muslim worshippers gathered for a mass Open Iftar and public prayers during Ramadan. The Islamic call to prayer, the adhan, echoed across the square.

Videos show rows of men kneeling, with amplified speakers broadcasting Arabic prayers over one of Britain’s most famous landmarks. This was not a quiet or private event. It was a public gathering, openly supported by London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s administration.

Conservative MP Nick Timothy spoke out strongly and described the event as “an act of domination” and “straight from the Islamist playbook.”

Timothy, who once advised Theresa May at Downing Street, argued that these visible displays of Islamic identity in historic public spaces are not just about multiculturalism. He said they are deliberate statements of supremacy that do not fit with Britain’s Christian foundations and national identity.

The timing matters. Ramadan 2026 has seen more public prayers across UK cities. The Trafalgar Square event, promoted as “inclusive,” broadcast the adhan loudly without comparable Christian or secular events. In countries like Saudi Arabia, public Christian worship is banned, yet Britain accommodates. To many Britons, it signals their heritage is open to change, while others’ are not.

This isn’t unique. Similar gatherings have occurred in New York’s Times Square during Ramadan, drawing criticism from American conservatives. In both countries, progressive politicians praise these events as “diversity wins” but often overlook the demographic and cultural changes. Britain’s Muslim population now exceeds 6.5% and is growing rapidly through immigration and birth rates, with more calls for public religious expression.

At what point does accommodation become surrender?

Security concerns are real. Large gatherings in central London raise risks. Past scandals and terror plots have shown that some communities have different loyalties, and officials warn about radicalization. Allowing the adhan in a square built to honor British victories suggests weakness, not strength, and signals to extremists that British landmarks are open to symbolic use.

Free speech and religious freedom should apply to everyone, but Britain’s double standard is becoming more obvious. A Christian street preacher quoting the Bible might be arrested for “hate speech.” At the same time, calls to prayer that say “Allah is the greatest” and reject other faiths are heard in public without challenge.

Tory MP Timothy’s comments highlight this double standard: the government silences local dissent while supporting or ignoring the spread of foreign cultures. This is identity politics at work—what is “pride” for one group can feel like erasure for another.

The broader cultural conflict is clear. Trafalgar Square has never been neutral. It honors Admiral Nelson, who defended Christendom against threats from the East. Its lions, fountains, and columns stand for British strength and Christian civilization. Replacing these symbols with mass prostration during Ramadan is not “enrichment.” It is a replacement.

Demographic projections suggest Muslims may become the majority in several major UK cities within a few decades, so these public displays are likely to increase. The question for policymakers, and for Americans watching their own cities, is whether Western nations still have the will to protect their founding identities.

The Church of England in Britain has mostly remained silent, showing years of institutional retreat. American evangelicals and Catholic leaders should pay attention: the same trends seen in London are happening in New York, Chicago, and other cities. Progressive leaders in both the UK and the US promote “inclusion,” while Christianity is quietly pushed aside. Schools remove Christmas references. Crosses are taken down. Yet the adhan grows louder.

Nick Timothy’s direct comments should be heard, not silenced. Britain and the West face a choice: reclaim public spaces as reflections of their Judeo-Christian heritage, or watch them become centers for another culture. Trafalgar Square is part of Britain. The adhan belongs somewhere else. Unless leaders act on this, the sense of domination will continue, one prayer, one square, and one concession at a time until full Islamisation is complete.

The post London’s Trafalgar Square Is British, Not for the Adhan: Tory MP Criticizes Public Islamic Prayer as Domination appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.